Scourlok® Retention Wall in Hornell, New York

 

Case study in protecting existing water main and water tanks

A 0.83 MG water tank was being installed in close proximity to an existing tank, with the new tank at a lower elevation and a steep slope in between. Unfortunately, an existing water main located between the two tanks prevented the implementation of a reinforced slope.

 

In order to maintain sufficient cover over the water main, it was decided that a retaining wall or vertical transition would be needed, and initially, a metal sheet pile wall was selected. Due to the cost and logistical challenges of the sheet pile, the design team decided to consider additional options.

 

The project team settled on rock-filled gabion baskets for the wall, as a geogrid wall or anchor tie-backs were not feasible, but was also open to other cost-effective options.

 

The goal was to install a cost-effective retaining wall to achieve the required vertical grade differential while protecting the existing water main and water tank.

 

Solution and installation: Scourlok®

When the contractor approached ACF/Ferguson Waterworks about gabion baskets, our team recommended using Scourlok® instead, due to a much faster installation process. The contractor and engineer both approved of the idea and a 106" x 8" (at the highest point) Scourlok® wall was selected.

 

The Scourlok® cells were shipped preassembled (prewrapped with geotextile on the inside and Pyramat on the outside) directly to the site and easily installed and connected following the pad’s radius. After each Scourlok® segment was installed (each approximately 15 feet long), they were filled with on-site material, reducing the need to remove much of the material from the site or to import crushed stone/rock as fill.

 

As an added benefit, the equipment required to install Scourlok® was significantly smaller than corresponding equipment for sheet pile wall installation—a benefit that was especially notable in the jobsite’s tight quarters.

 

Overall, the installation took two days versus the estimated six days that would have been required for the gabion wall.

 

Ferguson’s results

The Scourlok® retaining wall turned out well and offered significant cost savings when compared to the proposed metal sheet pile or gabion wall.

 

In addition, if the client desires to vegetate the wall in the future, they would have the option by filling the Pyramat pocket on the face of the system. As the site is industrial and aesthetics aren’t a concern, vegetation (while possible) was not a part of the installation process.

 

Learn more about our innovative solutions at ferguson.com/waterworks.